Cent Eur J Nurs Midw 2026, 17(3):2479-2486 | DOI: 10.15452/cejnm.2026.17.0015

Students’ and lecturers’ perspectives on supporting client autonomy: a focus group study on nine international nursing curricula

Marjolein Mathilda Catharina Johanna Knibbeler1,2, Stan Vluggen1,2, Henricus Johannes Leonardus van Rossum1,2, Sandra Maria Gabriella Zwakhalen1,2, Petra Mathilda Gerardus Erkens2
1 Research Centre Community Care, Academy of Nursing, Faculty of Healthcare, Zuyd University of Applied Sciences, Heerlen, The Netherlands
2 Department of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Living Lab in Ageing and Long-Term Care, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands

Aim: This study aimed to explore how students and lecturers from nine international nursing programs perceive the learning and teaching of supporting clients’ autonomy in daily living within nursing curricula.

Design: An exploratory qualitative design was used.

Methods: Two focus groups were conducted during the 2023 European Network of Nursing in Higher Education Intensive Program in Estonia, involving 41 students and lecturers from nine international nursing programs. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis.

Results: Three themes were identified: (1) defining autonomy and autonomy support; (2) presence of autonomy-supportive behavior within curricula; and (3) desirable situation of addressing autonomy in education. The findings revealed inconsistencies between teaching and practice, with students observing variable application by lecturers and supervisors. Both students and lecturers emphasized reflection, critical thinking, and closer collaboration to bridge theory-practice gaps and foster a shared, consistent approach.

Conclusion: The findings indicate variation in how autonomy support is addressed within participating nursing programs. Greater alignment between theoretical teaching and clinical practice, as well as increased collaboration between educational and practice settings, may strengthen students’ ability to support clients’ autonomy in daily care.

Klíčová slova: autonomy support, curricula, nursing education, nursing students, teaching and learning strategies

Vloženo: 10. září 2025; Revidováno: 1. červen 2026; Přijato: 1. červen 2026; Zveřejněno: 6. září 2026  Zobrazit citaci

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Catharina Johanna Knibbeler MM, Vluggen S, van Rossum HJL, Zwakhalen SMG, Gerardus Erkens PM. Students’ and lecturers’ perspectives on supporting client autonomy: a focus group study on nine international nursing curricula. Central European Journal of Nursing and Midwifery. 2026;17(3):2479-2486. doi: 10.15452/cejnm.2026.17.0015.
Sdílet...
Stáhnout citaci
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Zobrazit celý článek

    Reference

    1. Agich, G. J. (1990). Reassessing autonomy in long-term care. The Hastings Center Report, 20(6), 12-17. https://doi.org/10.2307/3563417 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    2. ATLAS.ti Scientific Software Development GmbH. (2024). ATLAS.ti (Version 24.0.0.29576) [Qualitative data analysis software]. https://atlasti.com
    3. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2023). Toward good practice in thematic analysis: avoiding common problems and be(com)ing a knowing researcher. International Journal of Transgender Health, 24(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1080/26895269.2022.2129597 Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
    4. Cremer, S. (2024). Undervalued & unexplored: underpinning and guiding nursing care in activities of daily living. [Doctoral thesis, Maastricht University]. https://doi.org/10.26481/dis.20240411sc Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    5. den Ouden, M., Kuk, N. O., Zwakhalen, S. M. G., Bleijlevens, M. H. C., Meijers, J. M. M., & Hamers, J. P. H. (2017). The role of nursing staff in the activities of daily living of nursing home residents. Geriatric Nursing, 38(3), 225-230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gerinurse.2016.11.002 Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
    6. Edemekong, P. F., Bomgaars, D. L., Sukumaran, S., & Schoo, C. (2025, May 4). Activities of daily living. StatPearls. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK470404/
    7. European Commission. (2025). Erasmus + programme guide 2025. European Union. https://erasmus-plus.ec.europa.eu/sites/default/files/2025-01/erasmus-programme-guide-v2.2025_en.pdf
    8. European Federation of Nurses Associations. (2015). EFN competency framework: EFN guideline to implement Article 31 into national nurses' education programmes. https://efn.eu/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/EFN-Competency-Framework-19-05-2015.pdf
    9. Henderson, V. (1966). The nature of nursing: a definition and its implications for practice, research, and education. Macmillan.
    10. Henderson, V., & Nite, G. (1978). Principles and practice of nursing. AJN The American Journal of Nursing, 78(9), 1574. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    11. Jacobs, G. (2019). Patient autonomy in home care: nurses' relational practices of responsibility. Nursing Ethics, 26(6), 1638-1653. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733018772070 Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
    12. Kitson, A., Conroy, T., Kuluski, K., Locock, L., & Lyons, R. (2013). Reclaiming and redefining the Fundamentals of Care: nursing's response to meeting patients' basic human needs. School of Nursing, The University of Adelaide. https://digital.library.adelaide.edu.au/server/api/core/bitstreams/584b1213-5d1f-44c5-ae5a-f723ff819349/content
    13. Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2014). Focus groups: a practical guide for applied research (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
    14. McCance, T., & McCormack, B. (2025). The person-centred nursing framework: a mid-range theory for nursing practice. Journal of Research in Nursing, 30(1), 47-60. https://doi.org/10.1177/17449871241281428 Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
    15. McCormack, B. (2001). Autonomy and the relationship between nurses and older people. Ageing & Society, 21(4), 417-446. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X01008303 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    16. McCormack, B. (2003). A conceptual framework for person-centred practice with older people. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 9(3), 202-209. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-172x.2003.00423.x Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
    17. Moilanen, T., Suhonen, R., & Kangasniemi, M. (2022). Nursing support for older people's autonomy in residential care: an integrative review. International Journal of Older People Nursing, 17(2), e12428. https://doi.org/10.1111/opn.12428 Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
    18. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68 Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
    19. Samanta, A., & Samanta, J. (2005). The human rights act 1998 - why should it matter for medical practice? Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 98(9), 404-410. https://doi.org/10.1177/014107680509800905 Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
    20. The Lancet Regional Health - Europe. (2023). Securing the future of Europe's ageing population by 2050. The Lancet Regional Health - Europe, 35, 100807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanepe.2023.100807 Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
    21. Thissen, L., Mach, A., Navarra, C., Fernandes, M., Saraceno, C., Gromada, A., Bell, T., Marzo, C., Lebrun, J.-F., Helfferich, B., Chieregato, E., & Sanden, F. (2023). The European care strategy: a chance to ensure inclusive care for all? Foundation for European Progressive Studies and Friedrich Ebert Stiftung. https://feps-europe.eu/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/FEPS-FES_Care-Strategy-Policy-Study-web-PP.pdf
    22. Tong, A., Sainsbury, P., & Craig, J. (2007). Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 19(6), 349-357. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzm042 Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
    23. United Nations. (2006). Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities and optional protocol. United Nations. https://www.un.org/disabilities/documents/convention/convoptprot-e.pdf
    24. Wenger, E. (1999). Communities of practice: learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    25. World Health Organization. (2017). Global strategy and action plan on ageing and health. WHO. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241513500

    Tento článek je publikován v režimu tzv. otevřeného přístupu k vědeckým informacím (Open Access), který je distribuován pod licencí Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0), která umožňuje nekomerční distribuci, reprodukci a změny, pokud je původní dílo řádně ocitováno. Není povolena distribuce, reprodukce nebo změna, která není v souladu s podmínkami této licence.


    Zpět na obsah