Cent Eur J Nurs Midw 2026, 17(2):2438-2445 | DOI: 10.15452/cejnm.2026.17.0012

Undergraduate nursing students’ reflections on simulation-based learning: a qualitative study

Jakob Renko, Helena Skočir, Patrik Pucer, Igor Karnjuš
Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Primorska, Slovenia

Aim: To gain a deeper understanding of undergraduate nursing students’ perspectives on simulation-based learning (SBL) conducted after clinical placements, with attention to perceived benefits, learning experiences, and suggested improvements.

Design: An exploratory qualitative approach was employed. Following an SBL experience, an analysis of students’ written reflections was conducted.

Methods: Written reflections of 146 second-year nursing students were analyzed after they had participated in high-fidelity simulations followed by a structured debriefing. The students’ responses were examined using conventional content analysis.

Results: Three themes emerged: perceived benefits, experiential aspects, and suggestions for improvement. Students reported improved self-confidence, teamwork, communication, and critical thinking skills. They appreciated the link between theory and practice, as well as the opportunity to practice rare but essential cases. As the scenarios progressed, their emotions shifted from anxiety to confidence, emphasizing the role of debriefing in reflection and learning. Students suggested allocating more time to simulations, diversifying the scenarios, and partially replacing clinical placements with SBL.

Conclusion: Post-clinical simulations provide an effective bridge between theory and practice, enhancing students’ technical, non-technical, and reflective skills, while elevating their professional preparedness. Strategic integration of SBL before and after clinical placement could strengthen curricula, ensure exposure to essential clinical scenarios, and enhance patient safety.

Klíčová slova: high-fidelity simulation, non-technical skills, nursing education, reflective learning, simulation-based learning

Vloženo: 16. září 2025; Revidováno: 11. březen 2026; Přijato: 14. květen 2026; Zveřejněno: 5. červen 2026  Zobrazit citaci

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Renko J, Skočir H, Pucer P, Karnjuš I. Undergraduate nursing students’ reflections on simulation-based learning: a qualitative study. Central European Journal of Nursing and Midwifery. 2026;17(2):2438-2445. doi: 10.15452/cejnm.2026.17.0012.
Sdílet...
Stáhnout citaci
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Zobrazit celý článek

    Reference

    1. Adib-Hajbaghery, M., & Sharifi, N. (2017). Effect of simulation training on the development of nurses and nursing students' critical thinking: a systematic literature review. Nurse Education Today, 50, 17-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2016.12.011 Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
    2. Alharbi, A., Nurfianti, A., Mullen, R. F., McClure, J. D., & Miller, W. H. (2024). The effectiveness of simulation-based learning (SBL) on students' knowledge and skills in nursing programs: a systematic review. BMC Medical Education, 24(1), 1099. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-06080-z Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    3. Alshehry, A. S., Cruz, J. P., Bashtawi, M. A., Almutairi, K. O., & Tumala, R. B. (2021). Nursing students' knowledge, competence and attitudes towards vital signs monitoring during clinical practice. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 30(5-6), 664-675. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15586 Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
    4. Bridge, P., Adeoye, J., Edge, C. N., Garner, V. L., Humphreys, A.-L., Ketterer, S.-J., Linforth, J. G., Manning-Stanley, A. S., Newsham, D., Prescott, D., Pullan, S. J., & Sharp, J. (2022). Simulated placements as partial replacement of clinical training time: a delphi consensus study. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 68, 42-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2022.04.009 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    5. Chow, K. M., Ahmat, R., Leung, A. W. Y., & Chan, C. W. H. (2023). Is high-fidelity simulation-based training in emergency nursing effective in enhancing clinical decision-making skills? A mixed methods study. Nurse Education in Practice, 69, 103610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2023.103610 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    6. Cohen, B. S., & Boni, R. (2018). Holistic nursing simulation: a concept analysis. Journal of Holistic Nursing, 36(1), 68-78. https://doi.org/10.1177/0898010116678325 Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
    7. Dartiguelongue, J. B., & Cafiero, P. J. (2021). Communication in health care teams. Archivos Argentinos De Pediatria, 119(6), e589-e593. https://doi.org/10.5546/aap.2021.eng.e589 Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
    8. Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107-115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
    9. Fawaz, M., & Alsalamah, Y. (2022). Clinical competence and self-efficacy of Lebanese and Saudi nursing students participating in simulation-based learning in nursing education. Nursing Forum, 57(2), 260-266. https://doi.org/10.1111/nuf.12673 Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
    10. INACSL Standards Committee, Decker, S., Alinier, G., Crawford, S. B., Gordon, R. M., Jenkins, D., & Wilson, C. (2021). Healthcare simulation standards of best practice: the debriefing process. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 58, 27-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2021.08.011 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    11. Jallad, S. T. (2025). Effectiveness of simulation-based education on educational practices of communication skills, satisfaction, and self-confidence among undergraduate nursing students. Creative Nursing, 31(2), 135-143. https://doi.org/10.1177/10784535241301115 Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
    12. Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice-Hall.
    13. Larue, C., Pepin, J., & Allard, É. (2015). Simulation in preparation or substitution for clinical placement: a systematic review of the literature. Journal of Nursing Education and Practice, 5(9), 132. https://doi.org/10.5430/jnep.v5n9p132 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    14. Mills, B. W., Carter, O. B. J., Rudd, C. J., Ross, N. P., & Claxton, L. A. (2015). Clinical placement before or after simulated learning environments? A naturalistic study of clinical skills acquisition among early-stage paramedicine students. Simulation in Healthcare, 10(5), 263-269. https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000107 Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
    15. Najjar, R. H., Lyman, B., & Miehl, N. (2015). Nursing students' experiences with high-fidelity simulation. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, 12(1), 20150010. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijnes-2015-0010 Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
    16. Ntumi, S. (2025). Validating high-fidelity simulation for assessing procedural skills in nursing education: a kane framework approach in Ghana. BMC Medical Education, 25(1), 1170. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-07724-4 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    17. Palese, A., Zabalegui, A., Sigurdardottir, A. K., Bergin, M., Dobrowolska, B., Gasser, C., Pajnkihar, M., & Jackson, C. (2014). Bologna process, more or less: nursing education in the European economic area: a discussion paper. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, 11(1), 63-73. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijnes-2013-0022 Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
    18. Shin, S., Park, J.-H., & Kim, J.-H. (2015). Effectiveness of patient simulation in nursing education: meta-analysis. Nurse Education Today, 35(1), 176-182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2014.09.009 Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
    19. Squires, K., Heaney, S., MacDonald-Wicks, L., Johnston, C., & Brown, L. (2022). Mapping simulated-based learning experiences incorporated into professional placements in allied health programs: a scoping review. Simulation in Healthcare, 17(6), 403-415. https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000627 Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
    20. Stufflebeam, D. L. (2003). The CIPP Model for Evaluation. In T. Kellaghan & D. L. Stufflebeam (Eds.), International Handbook of Educational Evaluation (pp. 31-62). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0309-4_4 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    21. Tamilselvan, C., Chua, S. M., Chew, H. S. J., & Devi, M. K. (2023). Experiences of simulation-based learning among undergraduate nursing students: a systematic review and meta-synthesis. Nurse Education Today, 121, 105711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2023.105711 Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
    22. Van Vuuren, S. (2016). Reflections on simulated learning experiences of occupational therapy students in a clinical skills unit at an institution of higher learning. South African Journal of Occupational Therapy, 46(3), 73-78. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    23. Watts, P. I. (2024). Blazing forward: simulation in nursing practice. Nursing Clinics of North America, 59(3), xv-xvi. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnur.2024.02.008 Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
    24. World Medical Association. (2013). World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA, 310(20), 2191-2194. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.281053 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    25. Zhang, C. (2023). A literature study of medical simulations for non-technical skills training in emergency medicine: twenty years of progress, an integrated research framework, and future research avenues. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(5), 4487. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20054487 Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...

    Tento článek je publikován v režimu tzv. otevřeného přístupu k vědeckým informacím (Open Access), který je distribuován pod licencí Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0), která umožňuje nekomerční distribuci, reprodukci a změny, pokud je původní dílo řádně ocitováno. Není povolena distribuce, reprodukce nebo změna, která není v souladu s podmínkami této licence.


    Zpět na obsah