Cent Eur J Nurs Midw 2022, 13(2):648-656 | DOI: 10.15452/cejnm.2022.13.0001

Adaptation into Turkish and evaluation of the psychometric properties of the Spiritual Care Competence Scale

Esra Nur Kabakci, Neşe Çelik
Midwifery Department, Faculty of Health Sciences, Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Eskisehir, Turkey

Aim: This study was conducted to adapt the Spiritual Care Competence Scale (SCCS) into the Turkish language and to psychometrically test it for use with Turkish midwives.

Design: A methodological study.

Design: A methodological study.

Methods: The study sample consisted of 250 midwives working at a state hospital in Turkey. First, the linguistic and content validity of the scale were evaluated. Next, the scale was tested in a pilot study. Finally, the construct validity and reliability of the scale were analysed.

Results: In this study, the content validity ratio value of each item on the SCCS as adapted into Turkish was found to range between 0.86 and 1.00, and the content validity ratio for the total scale was calculated at 0.99. The total variance explained by the scale was 69.1%. The SCCS for Turkish midwives (SCCS-TM), which consists of 27 items and five subscales, was tested by exploratory factor analysis. In the reliability analysis of the scale, Cronbach’s alpha value was 0.92, and the subscales ranged from 0.72 to 0.93.

Conclusion: The present study provides evidence of the SCCS-TM’s validity, and reliability. The scale is suitable for use with Turkish midwives.

Klíčová slova: midwifery, psychometric evaluation, spiritual care competence

Vloženo: 31. srpen 2021; Revidováno: 7. prosinec 2021; Přijato: 19. leden 2022; Zveřejněno: 6. červen 2022  Zobrazit citaci

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Kabakci EN, Çelik N. Adaptation into Turkish and evaluation of the psychometric properties of the Spiritual Care Competence Scale. Central European Journal of Nursing and Midwifery. 2022;13(2):648-656. doi: 10.15452/cejnm.2022.13.0001.
Sdílet...
Stáhnout citaci
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Zobrazit celý článek

    Reference

    1. Agyar, B. B., & Uzun, B. (2018). Developing the Social Media Addiction Scale: validity and reliability studies. Addicta: The Turkish Journal on Addictions, 5(3), 507-525. https://doi.org/10.15805/addicta.2018.5.3.0046 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    2. Attard, J., Baldacchino, D. R., & Camilleri, L. (2014). Nurses' and midwives' acquisition of competency in spiritual care: a focus on education. Nurse Education Today, 34(12), 1460-1466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2014.04.015 Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
    3. Boateng, G. O., Neilands, T. B., Frongillo, E. A., Melgar-Quiñonez, H. R., & Young, S. L. (2018). Best practices for developing and validating scales for health, social, and behavioral research: a primer. Frontiers in Public Health, 6, 149. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149 Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
    4. Boztilki, M., & Ardiç, E. (2017). Spirituality and health. Journal of Academic Research in Nursing, 3(1), 39-45. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    5. Carpenter, S. (2018). Ten steps in scale development and reporting: a guide for researchers. Communication Methods and Measures, 12(1), 25-44. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2017.1396583 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    6. Chung, M. J., Park, Y., & Eun, Y. (2016). Validity and reliability of Korean version of the Spiritual Care Competence Scale. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, 46(6), 871-880. https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2016.46.6.871 Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
    7. Coban, G. I., Şirin, M., & Yurttaş, A. (2017). Reliability and validity of the Spiritual Care-Giving Scale in a Turkish Population. Journal of Religion and Health, 56(1), 63-73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-015-0086-6 Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
    8. Crowther, S., & Hall, J. (2015) Spirituality and spiritual care in and around childbirth. Women and Birth, 28(2), 173-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2015.01.001 Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
    9. Çinar, F., & Eti Aslan, F. (2017). Spiritualism and nursing: The importance of spiritual care in intensive care patients. Journal of Academic Research in Nursing, 3(1), 37-42. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    10. Daaleman, T. P., Reed, D., Cohen, L. W., & Zimmerman, S. (2014). Development and preliminary testing of the Quality of Spiritual Care Scale. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 47(4), 793-800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2013.06.004 Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
    11. Daghan, S., Kalkim, A., & Midilli, T. S. (2019). Psychometric evaluation of the Turkish form of the Spiritual Care Competence Scale. Journal of Religion and Health, 58(1), 14-27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-018-0594-2 Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
    12. Dezorzi, L. W., Raymundo, M. M., Goldim, J. R., & Van Leeuwen, R. (2019). Cross-cultural validation of the Brazilian version of the Spiritual Care Competence Scale. Palliative & Supportive Care, 17(3), 322-327. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1478951518000159 Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
    13. Ercan, I., & Kan, I. (2004). Reliability and validity in the scales. Journal of Uludag University Medical Faculty, 30(3), 211-216.
    14. Ergul, S., & Temel, A. B. (2007). Validity and reliability of 'The spirituality and Spiritual Care Rating Scale' Turkish version. Journal of Ege University School of Nursing, 23(1), 75-87.
    15. Gaskin, I. M. (2010). Spiritual midwifery (4th ed.). Book Publishing Company.
    16. Gungor, D. (2016). Guidance for the development and adaptation of measuring instruments in psychology. Turkish Psychological Writing, 19(38), 104-112.
    17. Halil, E., & Kardas, S. (2017). Spiritual Well-Being: Scale development and validation. Spiritual Psychology and Counseling, 2(1), 73-88. https://doi.org/10.12738/spc.2017.1.0022 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    18. Hodge, D. R. (2018). Spiritual competence: What it is, why it is necessary, and how to develop it. Journal of Ethnic & Cultural Diversity in Social Work, 27(2), 124-139. http://doi.org/10.1080/15313204.2016.1228093 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    19. Kalkim, A., Midilli, T. S., & Daghan, S. (2018). Nursing students' perceptions of spirituality and spiritual care and their spiritual care competencies: a correlational research study. Journal of Hospice & Palliative Nursing, 20(3), 286-295. https://doi.org/10.1097/NJH.0000000000000446 Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
    20. Kartal, S. K., & Dirlik, E. M. (2016). Historical development of the concept of validity and the most preferred technique of reliability: Cronbach alpha coefficient. Journal of Abant Izzet Baysal University Faculty of Education, 16(4), 1865-1879.
    21. Khalaj, M., Pakpour, A., & Mohammadi Zeidi, I. (2013). Validity and reliability of a Persian version of Nursing Students' Competence Scale in Spiritual Care. Journal of Inflammatory Disease, 17(2), 63-70.
    22. Kilic, S. (2016). Cronbach's alpha coefficient. Journal of Mood Disorders, 6(1), 47-48. https://doi.org/10.5455/jmood.20160307122823 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    23. MacDonald, S., & Johnson, G. (2017). Maye's midwifery (15th ed.). Elsevier.
    24. Matsunaga, M. (2010). How to factor-analyze your data right: do's, don'ts, and how-to's. International Journal of Psychological Research, 3(1), 97-110. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    25. McSherry, W., Draper, P., & Kendrick, D. (2002). The construct validity of a rating scale designed to assess spirituality and spiritual care. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 39(7), 723-734. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7489(02)00014-7 Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
    26. Mermer, G., Akyuz, D. M., & Can, H. O. (2019). Midwifery students' perceptions of spiritually and spiritual care: An example from western Turkey. Journal of Religion and Health, 58(2), 666-676. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-018-0685-0. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
    27. Musa, A. S., & Pevalin, D. J. (2016). Development of the Arabic Spiritual Care Intervention-Provision Scale. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 25(15-16), 2275-2284. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13174 Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
    28. Otuzoglu, M., & Talas, M. S. (2019). Development of a scale to identify Spiritual Care Needs of Oncology Patients. International Journal of Medical Research & Health Sciences, 8(4), 39-53.
    29. Ross, L., McSherry, W., Giske, T., van Leeuwen, R., Schep-Akkerman, A., Koslander, T., Hall, J., Steenfeldt, V. Ø., & Jarvis, P. (2018). Nursing and midwifery students' perceptions of spirituality, spiritual care, and spiritual care competency: A prospective, longitudinal, correlational European study. Nurse Education Today, 67, 64-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2018.05.002 Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
    30. Tiew, L. H., & Creedy, D. K. (2012). Development and preliminary validation of a composite Spiritual Care-Giving Scale. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 49(6), 682-690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.11.014 Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
    31. Van Leeuwen, R., Tiesinga, L. J., Middel, B., Post, D., & Jochemsen, H. (2009). The validity and reliability of an instrument to assess nursing competencies in spiritual care. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 18(20), 2857-2869. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02594.x Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
    32. Yaslioglu, M. (2017). Factor analysis and validity in social sciences: Application of exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Istanbul University Journal of the School of Business, 46, 74-85.
    33. Yesilyurt, S., & Capraz, C. (2018). A road map for the content validity used in scale development studies. Erzincan University Journal of Education Faculty, 20(1), 251-264. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...

    Tento článek je publikován v režimu tzv. otevřeného přístupu k vědeckým informacím (Open Access), který je distribuován pod licencí Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0), která umožňuje nekomerční distribuci, reprodukci a změny, pokud je původní dílo řádně ocitováno. Není povolena distribuce, reprodukce nebo změna, která není v souladu s podmínkami této licence.


    Zpět na obsah