Cent Eur J Nurs Midw 2021, 12(1):235-244 | DOI: 10.15452/cejnm.2020.11.0038

Women’s childbirth satisfaction and obstetric outcomes comparison between two birth hospitals in Barcelona with different level of assistance and complexity

Pablo Rodríguez Coll1, Rocío Casañas2, Anna Collado Palomares3, Gladys Maldonado Aubián4, Florencio Duran Muñoz3, Xavier Espada-Trespalacios5, Ana Rodríguez Martínez6, Ramón Escuriet Peiro7
1 Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Barcelona, Spain
2 Research Department Centre d’Higiene Mental Les Corts, Barcelona, Spain
3 Vall D’Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Barcelona, Spain
4 Fundació Sanitària Mollet, Mollet del Vallés, Barcelona, Spain
5 Fundació Hospital Asil de Granollers, Granollers, Barcelona, Spain
6 Santa Lucia General University Hospital, Murcia Health Service, Cartagena, Murcia, Spain
7 Health and Integrated Care division, Catalan Health Service, Barcelona, Spain

Aim: Barcelona Hospital Campus Vall D’Hebron (Hospital A) and Hospital Mollet (Hospital B) provide women with humanized maternity care, but there are differences in dimension and complexity. This study describes the obstetrical results and women’s childbirth satisfaction of these two Spanish hospitals.

Design: A correlational descriptive study was conducted with 194 postpartum women.

Methods: Satisfaction and birth experience were evaluated using the CEQ-E and the MCSRSS questionnaires. A bivariate and discriminant analysis was conducted to evaluate the relationship between satisfaction and the recorded variables.

Results: There were significant differences between both hospitals in prenatal class attendance (p = 0.006), same midwife during all process (p = 0.000), and mode of delivery (p = 0.009). Significant association was found among overall satisfaction and immediate breastfeeding in the delivery room (p = 0.050), skin-to-skin contact (p = 0.004), beginning of labour (p = 0.031), and delivery mode (p = 0.011). The total questionnaires scores mean of CEQ-E and MCSRSS were Hospital A 66.97 and 130.64; Hospital B 67.98 and 129.98, respectively. Women at both hospitals were satisfied with different aspects.

Conclusion: Despite obtaining similar results in both hospitals, there are better obstetrical outcomes in hospital B with less complexity. However, women’s satisfaction scores are slightly different in certain questionnaires subscales between both hospitals.

Klíčová slova: childbirth, hospital, questionnaire, satisfaction, women

Vloženo: 9. srpen 2020; Revidováno: 23. listopad 2020; Přijato: 28. prosinec 2020; Zveřejněno online: 9. únor 2021; Zveřejněno: 5. březen 2021  Zobrazit citaci

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Rodríguez Coll P, Casañas R, Collado Palomares A, Maldonado Aubián G, Duran Muñoz F, Espada-Trespalacios X, et al.. Women’s childbirth satisfaction and obstetric outcomes comparison between two birth hospitals in Barcelona with different level of assistance and complexity. Central European Journal of Nursing and Midwifery. 2021;12(1):235-244. doi: 10.15452/cejnm.2020.11.0038.
Sdílet...
Stáhnout citaci
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Zobrazit celý článek

    Reference

    1. Behruzi, R., Hatem, M., Goulet, L., & Fraser, W. (2011). The facilitating factors and barriers encountered in the adoption of a humanized birth care approach in a highly specialized university affiliated hospital. BMC Women's Health, 11, 53. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6874-11-53 Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
    2. Bernitz, S., Øian, P., Sandvik, L., & Blix, E. (2016). Evaluation of satisfaction with care in a midwifery unit and an obstetric unit: a randomized controlled trial of low-risk women. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 16, 143. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-016-0932-x Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
    3. Biurrun Garrido, A., & Goberna Tricas, J. (2013). La humanización del trabajo de parto: necesidad de definir el concepto. Revisión bibliográfica [Humanising the job of childbirth: the need for a definition of the concept. Review of the bibliography]. Matronas Profesión, 14(2), 62-66.
    4. Bohren, M. A., Hofmeyr, G. J., Sakala, C., Fukuzawa, R. K., & Cuthbert, A. (2017). Continuous support for women during childbirth. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 7, CD003766. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003766.pub6 Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
    5. Brasil Ministry of Health. (2002). Programa Humanização do parto [Birth humanization programme]. http://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/parto.pdf
    6. Caballero, P., Delgado-García, B. E., Orts-Cortes, I., Moncho, J., Pereyra-Zamora, P., & Nolasco, A. (2016). Validation of the Spanish version of Mackey childbirth satisfaction rating scale. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 16, 78. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-016-0862-7 Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
    7. Carquillat, P., Vendittelli, F., Perneger, T., & Guittier, M. J. (2017). Development of a questionnaire for assessing the childbirth experience (QACE). BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 17, 279. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1462-x Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
    8. Conesa Ferrer, M. B., Canteras Jordana, M., Ballesteros Meseguer, C., Carrillo García, C., & Martínez Roche, M. E. (2016). Comparative study analysing women's childbirth satisfaction and obstetric outcomes across two different models of maternity care. BMJ Open, 6, e011362. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011362 Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
    9. Dencker, A., Taft, C., Bergqvist, L., Lilja, H., & Berg, M. (2010). Childbirth experience questionnaire (CEQ): development and evaluation of a multidimensional instrument. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 10, 81. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-10-81 Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
    10. Eke, A. C. (2017). How does continuous support affect outcomes for pregnant women during childbirth? Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 7, CD003766. https://doi.org/10.1002/cca.1851 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    11. FAME (Federación de Asociaciones de Matronas de España) [Federation of Spanish Midwives' Associations]. (2006, June). Iniciativa al Parto Normal. Documento de Consenso [Normal Birth Initiative. Consenus Document]. https://www.federacion-matronas.org/informacion-de-interes-para-profesionales/iniciativa-parto-normal-de-la-fame/
    12. Gluck, O., Pinchas-Cohen, T., Hiaev, Z., Rubinstein, H., Bar, J., & Kovo, M. (2020). The impact of childbirth education classes on delivery outcome. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 148(3), 300-304. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.13016 Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
    13. Goodman, P., Mackey, M. C., & Tavakoli, A. S. (2004). Factors related to childbirth satisfaction. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 46(2), 212-219. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2003.02981.x Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
    14. Harvey, S., Rach, D., Stainton, M. C., Jarrell, J., & Brant, R. (2002). Evaluation of satisfaction with midwifery care. Midwifery, 18(4), 260-267. https://doi.org/10.1054/midw.2002.0317 Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
    15. Hodnett, E. D. (2002). Pain and women's satisfaction with the experience of childbirth: a systematic review. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 186(Suppl 5), 160-172. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9378(02)70189-0 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    16. Jafari, E., Mohebbi, P., & Mazloomzadeh, S. (2017). Factors related to women's childbirth satisfaction in physiologic and routine childbirth groups. Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research, 22(3), 219-224. Přejít na PubMed...
    17. Kempe, P., & Vikström-Bolin, M. (2020). Women's satisfaction with the birthing experience in relation to duration of labour, obstetric interventions and mode of birth. European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 246, 156-159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.01.041 Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
    18. López-Mirones, M., Alonso-Salcines, A., Terán-Muñoz, O., García-Gonzáles, C., Laurrieta-Saiz, I., & González-Maestro, M. (2017). Satisfacción materna en el área de partos según la escala Mackey [Maternal satisfaction according to the Mackey scale]. Nuberos Científica, 3(21), 36-43.
    19. Marín-Morales, D., Carmona-Monge, F. J., Peñacoba-Puente, C., Olmos Albacete, R., & Toro Molina, S. (2013). Factor structure, validity, and reliability of the Spanish version of the women's views of birth labour satisfaction questionnaire. Midwifery, 29(12), 1339-1345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2012.12.015 Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
    20. Marrugat, J. (2012, April). Calculadora de Tamaño muestral GRANMO [GRANMO sample size calculator]. Barcelona Medical Research Municipal Institute. https://www.imim.es/ofertadeserveis/software-public/granmo/
    21. Mei, J. Y., Afshar, Y., Gregory, K. D., Kilpatrick, S. J., & Esakoff, T. F. (2016). Birth plans: what matters for birth experience satisfaction. Birth, 43(2), 144-150. https://doi.org/10.1111/birt.12226 Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
    22. Melender, H.-L. (2006). What constitutes a good childbirth? A qualitative study of pregnant Finnish women. Journal of Midwifery and Women's Health, 51(5), 331-339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmwh.2006.02.009 Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
    23. NICE (National Institute for Healthcare and Excelence). (2017, February). Quality statement 2: One-to-one care | Intrapartum care | Quality standards. U. K. National Institute for Healthcare and Excelence. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/qs105/chapter/Quality-statement-2-One-to-one-care
    24. Sánchez Fortis, A., Sánchez Fortis, C., & Pozo Cano, M. D. (2018). Satisfacción de las mujeres con la atención al parto [Satisfaction of women with delivery care]. Matronas Hoy, 1(6), 31-36.
    25. Sehhati, F., Najjarzadeh, M., Seyyedrasouli, A., & Zamanzadeh, V. (2012). Effect of continuous midwifery care on length of labor. Journal of Caring Sciences, 1(1), 47-52. https://doi.org/10.5681/jcs.2012.007 Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
    26. Senti, J., & LeMire, S. D. (2011). Patient satisfaction with birthing center nursing care and factors associated with likelihood to recommend institution. Journal of Nursing Care Quality, 26(2), 178-185. https://doi.org/10.1097/NCQ.0b013e3181fe93e6 Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
    27. Servei Català de la Salut [Catalan Health Service]. (2016, October). Estudi satisfacció embaràs part puerperi 2016 [2016 Birth and puerperium satisfaction study]. Catalan Health Service CatSalut. https://catsalut.gencat.cat/web/.content/minisite/catsalut/ciutadania/serveis_atencio_salut/valoracio_serveis_atencio_salut/enquestes_satisfaccio/atencio_embaras_part_puerperi/2016/EPP_2016.pdf
    28. Soriano-Vidal, F. J., Oliver-Roig, A., Cabrero-García, J., Congost-Maestre, N., Dencker, A., & Richart-Martínez, M. (2016). The Spanish version of the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ-E): reliability and validity assessment. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 16, 372. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-016-1100-z Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
    29. Spanish Ministry of Health and Consumer's Affaires. (2008). Strategy for Assistance at Normal Childbirth in the National Health System 2007. https://www.mscbs.gob.es/organizacion/sns/planCalidadSNS/pdf/equidad/estrategiaPartoNormalEnglish.pdf
    30. Sydsjö, G., Blomberg, M., Palmquist, S., Angerbjörn, L., Bladh, M., & Josefsson, A. (2015). Effects of continuous midwifery labour support for women with severe fear of childbirth. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 15, 115. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-015-0548-6 Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
    31. Tedesco, R. P., Maia Filho, N. L., Mathias, L., Benez, A. L., de Castro, V. C. L., Bourroul, G. M., & dos Reis, F. I. (2004). Fatores determinantes para as expectativas de primigestas acerca da via de parto [Primigravid expectations about the delivery method and the causal factors for their choice]. Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia, 26(10), 791-798. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0100-72032004001000006 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    32. Waldenström, U. (2004). Why do some women change their opinion about childbirth over time? Birth, 31(2), 102-107. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0730-7659.2004.00287.x Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
    33. WHO (World Health Organization). (2016, January). Recommendations on antenatal care for a positive pregnancy experience. World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241549912
    34. WHO (World Health Organization). (2018). WHO recommendations: intrapartum care for a positive childbirth experience. World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/intrapartum-care-guidelines/en/

    Tento článek je publikován v režimu tzv. otevřeného přístupu k vědeckým informacím (Open Access), který je distribuován pod licencí Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0), která umožňuje nekomerční distribuci, reprodukci a změny, pokud je původní dílo řádně ocitováno. Není povolena distribuce, reprodukce nebo změna, která není v souladu s podmínkami této licence.


    Zpět na obsah