Cent Eur J Nurs Midw 2018, 9(1):799-810 | DOI: 10.15452/CEJNM.2018.09.0007

CREATION AND VALIDATION OF Q-DIO, AN INSTRUMENT FOR RATING THE QUALITY OF NURSING DOCUMENTATION - LITERATURE REVIEW

Dagmar Šerková1,*, Jana Marečková2,3
1 Department of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Czech Republic (student)
2 Department of Anthropology and Health Education, Faculty of Education, Palacký University Olomouc, Czech Republic
3 The Czech Republic (Middle European) Centre for Evidence-Based Healthcare: A Joanna Briggs Institute Centre of Excellence, Czech Republic

Aim: To summarize relevant information on the creation and validation of the Quality of Nursing Diagnoses, Interventions and Outcomes (Q-DIO) assessment instrument.

Design: A literature review.

Methods: To search for studies, the first two steps of a standard evidence-based healthcare approach were used: 1) formulation of a search question and 2) structured documented search including assessment of the relevance of abstracts and full text of studies to the search question and inclusion criteria. In relevant studies, the level of evidence was evaluated using the Joanna Briggs Institute categories.

Results: Out of 212 results of two-step search in scholarly databases and grey literature sources, only three literature resources were relevant. The newly developed Q-DIO instrument was assessed by its authors using content and face validation (100% consensus of experts and 88.25% agreement), intrarater (r = 0.98; p < 0.0001; κ = 0.95; p < 0.0001) and interrater reliability (r = 0.99; p < 0.0001, κ = 0.95; p < 0.0001) and internal consistency of the concepts of the instrument (Cα = 0.83; Cα = 0.98; Cα = 0.90; Cα = 0.99). Item analysis was carried out to determine both difficulty and discriminative validity of the items.

Conclusion: Q-DIO was by the authors marked as valid assessment instrument by its authors. However, since the assessed instrument items are formulated without identifying currently valid NNN nomenclature terminology, they should be specified prior to a particular assessment of the quality of nursing documentation.

Klíčová slova: item analysis, literature review, Q-DIO, quality of documentation, reliability, validation

Vloženo: 20. červenec 2017; Přijato: 23. září 2017; Zveřejněno: 30. březen 2018  Zobrazit citaci

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Šerková D, Marečková J. CREATION AND VALIDATION OF Q-DIO, AN INSTRUMENT FOR RATING THE QUALITY OF NURSING DOCUMENTATION - LITERATURE REVIEW. Central European Journal of Nursing and Midwifery. 2018;9(1):799-810. doi: 10.15452/CEJNM.2018.09.0007.
Sdílet...
Stáhnout citaci
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Zobrazit celý článek

    Reference

    1. Baudino M, Vernassa A. Computer-assisted nursing care process: a retrospective study. In: Sheerin F, Sermeus W, Ehrenberg A, editors. E-health and nursing innovating for the future: 9th European conference of ACENDIO. Ireland: Dublin; 2013. p. 345-348. Available from: http://www.acendio.net/members/proceedings/ACENDIO2013.pdf
    2. Baudino M, Vernassa A, De Pieri C, Massano S, Contini S, Boarino G, Brociero MG. Assessment and care plans based on standardized and computerized language: a retrospective study. In: Sheerin F, Sermeus W, Ehrenberg A, editors. Ehealth and nursing - knowledge for patient care: 10th European conference of ACENDIO. Ireland: Dublin; 2015. p. 293-296. Available from: http://www.acendio.net/members/proceedings/ACENDIO2015.pdf
    3. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of selfreport measures. Spine. 2000;25(24):3186-3191. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
    4. Björvell C, Thorell-Ekstrand I, Wredling R. Development of an audit instrument for nursing care plans in the patient record. Quality in Health Care. 2000;9(1):6-13. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
    5. Bruylands M, Paans W, Hediger H, Müller-Staub M. Effects on the quality of the nursing care process through an educational program and the use of electronic nursing documentation. International Journal of Nursing Knowledge. 2013;24(3):163-170. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
    6. Florin JF, Ehrenberg A, Ehnfors M. Quality of nursing diagnoses: evaluation of an educational intervention. International Journal of Nursing Terminologies and Classifications. 2005;16(2):33-43. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
    7. Klugar, M. Systematická review ve zdravotnictví. Olomouc: Univerzita Palackého v Olomouci; 2015. (in Czech)
    8. Klugarová, J, Klugar, M, Marečková, J, Hájek, M. Methodology of systematic review development I: the effectiveness of hyperbaric oxygen therapy on mortality in adults with craniotrauma. Czech and Slovak Neurology and Neurosurgery. 2015;78(5):555-561.
    9. Linch GF, Müller-Staub M, Moraes MA, Azzolin K, Rabelo ER. Cross-cultural adaptation of the Quality of Diagnoses, Interventions and Outcomes (Q-DIO) instrument into Brazilian Portuguese. International Journal of Nursing Knowledge. 2012;23(3):153-158. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
    10. Linch GF, Rabelo-Silva ER, Keenan GM, Moraes MA, Stifter J, Müller-Staub M. Validation of the Quality of Diagnoses, Interventions and Outcomes (Q-DIO) instrument for use in Brazil and the United States. International Journal of Nursing Knowledge. 2015;26(1):19-25. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
    11. Marečková J, Jarošová D. NANDA domény v posouzení a diagnostické fázi ošetřovatelského procesu. 1. vyd. Ostrava: Ostravská univerzita, Zdravotně sociální fakulta; 2005. (in Czech)
    12. Marečková J, Klugarová J, Gurková E, Jarošová D, Klugar M, Zeleníková R. Evidence-based healthcare. Zdravotnictví založené na vědeckých důkazech. Olomouc: Univerzita Palackého v Olomouci; 2015. Available from: http://cebhc.upol.cz/upload/soubory/monografie/ebhc_ekniha_2015.pdf (in Czech)
    13. Marečková, J. Editorial. Central European Journal of Nursing and Midwifery. 2016;7(3):461. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    14. Marini M, Chaves EH. Evaluation of the accuracy of nursing diagnoses in a Brazilian emergency service. International Journal of Nursing Terminologies and Classification. 2011;22(2):56-67. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
    15. Mateos-García MD, Müller-Staub M, Porcel-Gálvez A, GilGarcía E, Ramos-González-Serna A, Barrientos Trigo S. Questionnaire for the assessment of the Quality of Diagnoses, Interventions and Outcomes (Q-DIO). Cross-cultural adaptation to Spanish. In: Sheerin F, Sermeus W, Ehrenberg A, editors. E-health and nursing - knowledge for patient care: 10th European conference of ACENDIO. Ireland: Dublin; 2015. p. 565-567. Available from: http://www.acendio.net/members/proceedings/ACENDIO2015.pdf
    16. Müller-Staub M, Needham I, Odenbreit M, Lavin MA, van Achterberg T. Improved quality of nursing documentation: results of a nursing diagnoses, interventions and outcomes implementation study. International Journal of Nursing Terminologies and Classifications. 2007a;18(1):5-17. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
    17. Müller-Staub M. Evaluation of the implementation of nursing diagnostics. A study on the use of nursing diagnoses, interventions and outcomes in nursing documentation. Dissertation. Bern: St. Radboud University; 2007b. Available from: http://repository.ubn.ru.nl/bitstream/handle/2066/40179/40179.pdf?sequence=1
    18. Müller-Staub M, Lunney M, Lavin MA, Needham I, Odenbreit M, van Achterberg T. Testing the Q-DIO as an instrument to measure the documented quality of nursing diagnoses, interventions and outcomes. International Journal of Nursing Terminologies and Classifications. 2008a;19(1):20-27. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
    19. Müller-Staub M, Needham I, Odenbreit M, Lavin MA, van Achterberg T. Implementing nursing diagnostics effectively: cluster randomized trial. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2008b;63(3):291-301. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
    20. Müller-Staub M, Lunney M, Odenbreit M, Needham I, Lavin MA, van Achterberg T. Development of an instrument to measure the quality of documented nursing diagnoses, interventions and outcomes: the Q-DIO. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2009;18(7):1027-1037. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
    21. Nomura ATG, da Silva MB, Almeida MdA. Quality of nursing documentation before and after the hospital accreditation in a university hospital. Revista LatinoAmericana de Enfermagem. 2016;24:e2813. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
    22. Nordström G, Gardulf A. Nursing documentation in patient records. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences. 1996;10(1):27-33. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
    23. Odutayo PO, Olaogun AA, Oluwatosin AO, Ogunfowokan AA. Impact of an educational program on the use of standardized nursing languages for nursing documentation among public health nurses in Nigeria. International Journal of Nursing Knowledge. 2013;24(2):108-112. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
    24. Paans W, Müller-Staub M. Developing an international nursing documentation audit instrument: Expert consensus study. In: Sheerin F, Sermeus W, Ehrenberg A, editors. Ehealth and nursing innovating for the future: 9th European conference of ACENDIO. Ireland: Dublin; 2013. p. 122-142. Available from: http://www.acendio.net/members/proceedings/ACENDIO2013.pdf
    25. Paans W, Sermeus W, Nieweg RM, van der Schans CP. DCatch instrument: development and psychometric testing of measurement instrument for nursing documentation in hospitals. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2010;66(6):1388- 1400. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
    26. Polit DF, Tatano Beck C. Nursing research: Principles and methods. 7th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins; 2004.
    27. Rabelo-Silva ER, Dantas Cavalcanti AC, Ramos Goulart Caldas MC, Lucena AF, Almeida MA, Linch GF, da Silva MB, Müller-Staub M. Advanced nursing process quality: comparing the International Classification for Nursing Practice (ICNP) with the NANDA-International (NANDA-I) and Nursing Interventions Classification (NIC). Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2017;26(3-4):379-387. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
    28. Seen S, Lötscher R, Müller-Staub M. Cross-cultural adaptation of the French version of the Q-DIO Instrument: model and preliminary findings. In F. Sheerin W. Sermeus A. Ehrenberg, editors. E-health and nursing - knowledge for patient care: 10th European conference of ACENDIO. Ireland: Dublin; 2015. p. 291-293. Available from: http://www.acendio.net/members/proceedings/ACENDIO2015.pdf
    29. Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press, New York; 1995.
    30. Wang N, Hailey D, Yu P. Quality of nursing documentation and approaches to its evaluation: a mixed-method systematic review. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2011;67(9):1858- 1875. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
    31. Zanon D, Gralher D, Müller-Staub M. Nursing diagnosis acute pain interventions and outcome: evaluation of patients' experience after total hip replacement compared with the nursing record - a mixed methods study. In: Sheerin F, Sermeus W, Ehrenberg A, editors. E-health and nursing - knowledge for patient care: 10th European conference of ACENDIO. Ireland: Dublin; 2015. p. 565-567. Available from: http://www.acendio.net/members/proceedings/ACENDIO2015.pdf

    Tento článek je publikován v režimu tzv. otevřeného přístupu k vědeckým informacím (Open Access), který je distribuován pod licencí Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0), která umožňuje nekomerční distribuci, reprodukci a změny, pokud je původní dílo řádně ocitováno. Není povolena distribuce, reprodukce nebo změna, která není v souladu s podmínkami této licence.


    Zpět na obsah