Cent Eur J Nurs Midw 2022, 13(1):571-578 | DOI: 10.15452/cejnm.2021.12.0022

The Czech version of the Surgical Fear Questionnaire: measuring validity and reliability

Renáta Zeleníková1, Kristýna Kovářová2, Petr Bujok3, Maurice Theunissen4,5
1 Department of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Czech Republic
2 Department of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Czech Republic (student)
3 Department of Informatics and Computers, Faculty of Science, University of Ostrava, Czech Republic
4 Department of Clinical Psychological Science, Maastricht University, the Netherlands
5 Department of Anesthesiology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands

Aim: The aim of the study was to examine the psychometric properties of the Czech version of the Surgical Fear Questionnaire.

Design: A cross-sectional study design. STROBE guidelines for reporting observational studies were followed for the study.

Methods: The study sample consisted of 332 adult patients from the Czech Republic. The Surgical Fear Questionnaire (SFQ) was used to measure preoperative fear. Cronbach’s alpha was calculated to test reliability. The construct validity of the SFQ was tested using exploratory factor analysis.

Results: Reliability of the instrument as a whole was confirmed by the high value of the Cronbach alpha coefficient (0.813). Two factors were identified for the Czech version of the SFQ in factor analysis.

Conclusion: The Czech version of the Surgical Fear Questionnaire showed good validity and reliability and can be used in research and clinical practice. Further analysis of psychometric properties is needed to confirm these results.

Keywords: preoperative fear, reliability, surgery, Surgical Fear Questionnaire, validity

Received: February 16, 2021; Revised: March 12, 2021; Accepted: May 26, 2021; Prepublished online: July 4, 2021; Published: March 5, 2022  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Zeleníková R, Kovářová K, Bujok P, Theunissen M. The Czech version of the Surgical Fear Questionnaire: measuring validity and reliability. Central European Journal of Nursing and Midwifery. 2022;13(1):571-578. doi: 10.15452/cejnm.2021.12.0022.
Download citation

References

  1. Aust, H., Eberhart, L., Sturm, T., Schuster, M., Nestoriuc, Y., Brehm, F., & Rüsch, D. (2018). A cross-sectional study on preoperative anxiety in adults. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 111, 133-139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2018.05.012 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Ayyadhah Alanazi, A. (2014). Reducing anxiety in preoperative patients: a systematic review. British Journal of Nursing, 23(7), 387-393. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2014.23.7.387 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Bağdigen, M., & Karaman Özlü, Z. (2018). Validation of the Turkish version of the Surgical Fear Questionnaire. Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing, 33(5), 708-714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jopan.2017.05.007 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Berth, H., Petrowski, K., & Balck, F. (2007). The Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale (APAIS) - the first trial of a German version. Psycho-Social Medicine, 4, Doc01. Go to original source...
  5. Boker, A., Brownell, L., & Donen, N. (2002). The Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale provides a simple and reliable measure of preoperative anxiety. Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia, 49(8), 792-798. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03017410 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Buonanno, P., Laiola, A., Palumbo, C., Spinelli, G., Terminiello, V., & Servillo, G. (2017). Italian validation of the Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale. Minerva Anestesiologica, 83(7), 705-711. https://doi.org/10.23736/S0375-9393.16.11675-X Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Burton, D., King, A., Bartley, J., Petrie, K. J., & Broadbent, E. (2019). The Surgical Anxiety Questionnaire (SAQ): development and validation. Psychology & Health, 34(2), 129-146. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2018.1502770 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Celik, F., & Edipoglu, I. S. (2018). Evaluation of preoperative anxiety and fear of anesthesia using APAIS score. European Journal of Medical Research, 23(1), 41. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-018-0339-4 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Çetinkaya, F., Kavuran, E., & Ünal Aslan, K. S. (2019). Validity and reliability of the Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale in the Turkish population. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, 49(1), 178-183. https://doi.org/10.3906/sag-1806-84 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Correll, D. (2017). Chronic postoperative pain: recent findings in understanding and management. F1000Research, 6, 1054. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.11101.1 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. De Hert, S., Staender, S., Fritsch, G., Hinkelbein, J., Afshari, A., Bettelli, G., Bock, M., Chew, M. S., Coburn, M., De Robertis, E., Drinhaus, H., Feldheiser, A., Geldner, G., Lahner, D., Macas, A., Neuhaus, C., Rauch, S., Santos-Ampuero, M. A., Solca, M., Tanha, N., Traskaite, V., Wagner, G., & Wappler, F. (2018). Pre-operative evaluation of adults undergoing elective noncardiac surgery: updated guideline from the European Society of Anaesthesiology. European Journal of Anaesthesiology, 35(6), 407-465. https://doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0000000000000817 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Eberhart, L., Aust, H., Schuster, M., Sturm, T., Gehling, M., Euteneuer, F., & Rüsch, D. (2020). Preoperative anxiety in adults - a cross-sectional study on specific fears and risk factors. BMC Psychiatry, 20(1), 140. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-020-02552-w Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Hair, J. F., Gabriel, L. D. S. M., da Silva, D., & Braga Junior, S. (2019). Development and validation of attitudes measurement scales: fundamental and practical aspects. RAUSP Management Journal, 54(4), 490-507. https://doi.org/10.1108/RAUSP-05-2019-0098 Go to original source...
  14. Homzová, P., & Zeleníková, R. (2015). Measuring preoperative anxiety in patients undergoing elective surgery in Czech Republic. Central European Journal of Nursing and Midwifery, 6(4), 321-326. https://doi.org/10.15452/CEJNM.2015.06.0023 Go to original source...
  15. Kindler, C. H., Harms, C., Amsler, F., Ihde-Scholl, T., & Scheidegger, D. (2000). The visual analog scale allows effective measurement of preoperative anxiety and detection of patients' anesthetic concerns. Anesthesia and Analgesia, 90(3), 706-712. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000539-200003000-00036 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Kovářová, K., & Zeleníková, R. (2020). Hodnocení strachu u pacientů před plánovanou operací. Praktický lékař, 100(5), 240-244.
  17. Matthias, A. T., & Samarasekera, D. N. (2012). Preoperative anxiety in surgical patients - experience of a single unit. Acta Anaesthesiologica Taiwanica, 50(1), 3-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aat.2012.02.004 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Maurice-Szamburski, A., Loundou, A., Capdevila, X., Bruder, N., & Auquier, P. (2013). Validation of the French version of the Amsterdam preoperative anxiety and information scale (APAIS). Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 11, 166. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-11-166 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Moerman, N. (1996). Psychological aspects of anesthesia. University of Amsterdam.
  20. Moerman, N., van Dam, F. S., Muller, M. J., & Oosting, H. (1996). The Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale (APAIS). Anesthesia and Analgesia, 82(3), 445-451. Go to original source...
  21. Mohd Fahmi, Z., Lai, L. L., & Loh, P. S. (2015). Validation of the Malay version of the Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale (APAIS). The Medical Journal of Malaysia, 70(4), 243-248. Go to PubMed...
  22. Nishimori, M., Moerman, N., Fukuhara, S., van Dam, F. S., Muller, M. J., Hanaoka, K., & Yamada, Y. (2002). Translation and validation of the Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale (APAIS) for use in Japan. Quality of Life Research, 11(4), 361-364. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1015561129899 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. Peterson, R. A. (1994). A meta-analysis of Cronbachʼs coefficient alpha. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(2), 381-391. Go to original source...
  24. Rattray, J., & Jones, M. C. (2007). Essential elements of questionnaire design and development. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 16(2), 234-243. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01573.x Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  25. Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach's Alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48, 1273-1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2 Go to original source...
  26. Theunissen, M., Peters, M. L., Schouten, E. G. W., Fiddelers, A. A. A., Willemsen, M. G. A., Pinto, P. R., Gramke, H.-F., Marcus, M. A. E. (2014). Validation of the Surgical Fear Questionnaire in adult patients waiting for elective surgery. PLoS ONE, 9(6), e100225. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0100225 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  27. Theunissen, M., Peters, M. L., Bruce, J., Gramke, H. F., & Marcus, M. A. (2012). Preoperative anxiety and catastrophizing: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the association with chronic postsurgical pain. The Clinical Journal of Pain, 28(9), 819-841. https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0b013e31824549d6 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  28. Theunissen, M., Jonker, S., Schepers, J., Nicolson, N. A., Nuijts, R., Gramke, H. F., Marcus, M., & Peters, M. L. (2018). Validity and time course of surgical fear as measured with the Surgical Fear Questionnaire in patients undergoing cataract surgery. PLoS ONE, 13(8), e0201511. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201511 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  29. Vergara-Romero, M., Morales-Asencio, J. M., Morales-Fernández, A., Canca-Sanchez, J. C., Rivas-Ruiz, F., & Reinaldo-Lapuerta, J. A. (2017). Validation of the Spanish version of the Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale (APAIS). Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 15(1), 120. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-017-0695-8 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  30. Villa, G., Lanini, I., Amass, T., Bocciero, V., Scirè Calabrisotto, C., Chelazzi, C., Romagnoli, S., De Gaudio, A. R., & Lauro Grotto, R. (2020). Effects of psychological interventions on anxiety and pain in patients undergoing major elective abdominal surgery: a systematic review. Perioperative medicine, 9(1), 38. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13741-020-00169-x Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  31. Wilson, C. J., Mitchelson, A. J., Tzeng, T. H., El-Othmani, M. M., Saleh, J., Vasdev, S., LaMontagne, H. J., & Saleh, K. J. (2016). Caring for the surgically anxious patient: a review of the interventions and a guide to optimizing surgical outcomes. American Journal of Surgery, 212(1), 151-159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2015.03.023 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  32. Wu, H., Zhao, X., Chu, S., Xu, F., Song, J., Ma, Z., & Gu, X. (2020). Validation of the Chinese version of the Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale (APAIS). Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 18(1), 66. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-020-01294-3 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  33. Zeleníková, R., Homzová, P., Homza, M., & Bužgová, R. (2017). Validity and reliability of the Czech version of the Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale (APAIS). Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing, 32(5), 429-437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jopan.2016.03.007 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  34. Zemła, A., Nowicka-Sauer, K., Jarmoszewicz, K., Wera, K., Batkiewicz, S., & Pietrzykowska, M. (2019). Measures of preoperative anxiety. Anaesthesiology Intensive Therapy, 51(1), 66-72. https://doi.org/10.5603/AIT.2019.0013 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.