Cent Eur J Nurs Midw 2014, 5(2):72-77

An analysis of subjective assessment of swallowing function in older adults using the EAT-10 questionnaire

Petra Mandysová1,2,*, Kateřina Petržílková1, Jana Škvrňáková1,3, Edvard Ehler1,2
1 Faculty of Health Studies, University of Pardubice, Czech Republic
2 Neurology Clinic, Regional Hospital Pardubice, Czech Republic
3 Clinic of Otorhinolaryngology and Surgery of the Head and Throat, Regional Hospital Pardubice, Czech Republic

Aim: In 2011, a study was carried out focusing on the prevalence and degree of subjective swallowing difficulties in older adults. The aim was to extend this scrutiny and using the already existing data, to conduct a comprehensive analysis of relationships between the individual items of the assessment tool.

Methods: 160 older adults from 5 institutions of health and social care in the Liberec region participated in the study. They evaluated their swallowing function using the 10-item Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10). For each item, a scale from 0 (no problem) to 4 points (severe problem) was used. The relationship between any two given items was expressed using the Kendall coefficient τb.

Results: In all but one case, the relationships between the items were statistically highly significant (p-value < 0.01). All the obtained values of τb were positive. Very tight relationships existed between "emotional" items (τb > 0.7). Tight relationships also existed between selected physical items (τb > 0.6). The highest number of tight relationships was present for the item concerning stressful swallowing (τb > 0.6 for a relationship with 6 items). Tight relationships were lacking for the item assessing pill swallowing (τb < 0.5 for all relationships).

Conclusion: Subjective swallowing difficulties were present in the emotional, functional and physical areas. A very tight relationship existed between several pairs of items and it is possible that in some cases, the tool items are duplicated, i.e. redundant. The question is whether the EAT-10 is a suitable tool for subjective assessment of swallowing.

Keywords: dysphagia, EAT-10, swallowing function, older adults, subjective assessment

Received: July 24, 2013; Accepted: January 14, 2014; Published: September 30, 2014  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Mandysová P, Petržílková K, Škvrňáková J, Ehler E. An analysis of subjective assessment of swallowing function in older adults using the EAT-10 questionnaire. Central European Journal of Nursing and Midwifery. 2014;5(2):72-77.
Download citation

References

  1. Belafsky PC, Mouadeb DA, Rees CJ, Pryor JC, Postma GN, Allen J, Leonard RJ. Validity and reliability of the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10). Annuals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology. 2008;117(12):919-924. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Borson S, Scanlan JM, Watanabe J, Tu SP, Lessig M. Improving identification of cognitive impairment in primary care. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry. 2006;21(4):349-355. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Cope CJ. Beneath the surface: The experience of learning about information systems. Santa Rosa, California, USA: Informing Science Press; 2006.
  4. Doncha H, Dempster M. Psychology statistics for dummies. Chichester, Great Britain: John Wiley & Sons; 2012.
  5. Gliem JA, Gliem RR. 2003 Midwest Research to Practice Conference in Adult, Continuing, and Community Education: Calculating, interpreting, and reporting Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient for Likert-type scales; 2003. [Cited 2011-05-14]. Available from: https://scholarworks.iupui.edu/bitstream/handle/1805/344/
  6. Gliem+&+Gliem.pdf?sequence=1 Hendl J. Přehled statistických metod (Outline of statistical methods). 4. rozšířené vydání. Praha: Portál; 2012. (in Czech)
  7. Chen PH, Golub JS, Hapner ER, Johns MM. Prevalence of perceived dysphagia and quality-of-life impairment in a geriatric population. Dysphagia. 2009;24(1):1-6. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Kozel R, Mynarova L, Svobodova H. Moderní metody a techniky marketingového výzkumu.(Modern methods and marketing research techniques) Praha: Grada Publishing; 2011. (in Czech)
  9. Love AL, Cornwell PL, Whitehouse SL. Oropharyngeal dysphagia in an elderly post-operative hip fracture population: a prospective cohort study. Age & Ageing. 2013;42:782-785. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Morgan GA, Leech NL, Gloeckner GW, Barrett KC. IBM SPSS for introductory statistics: Use and interpretation. 4th ed. New York, USA: Taylor & Francis Group; 2011. Go to original source...
  11. Neuendorf K. Internal consistency reliability: Can Cronbach's alfa be too high? COM 631-Multivariate analysis; 2011.
  12. Petrzilkova K. Zjišťování subjektivních změn v polykání. (Identification of subjective changes in swallowing); 2012. [Cited 2013-05-12]. Available from: <http://hdl.handle.net/10195/45743> (in Czech)
  13. Petrzilkova K, Mandysova P, Skvrnakova J, Ehler E. Subjektivní hodnocení polykací funkce u seniorů: využití zahraničního nástroje EAT -10. (Subjective assessment of swallowing function in older adults: the use of a foreign tool EAT-10). Kontakt. 2012;14(3):261-268. (in Czech) Go to original source...
  14. Sim J, Wright C. Research in health care: concepts, designs, and methods. Cheltenham, Great Britain: Nelson Thornes; 2000.
  15. Steele CM, Greenwood C, Ens I, Robertson C, SeidmanCarlson R. Mealtime difficulties in a home for the aged: not just dysphagia. Dysphagia. 1997;12(1):43-51. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Sura L, Madhavan A, Carnaby G, Crary MA. Dysphagia in the elderly: management and nutritional considerations. Clinical interventions in aging. 2012;7:287-298. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Vejrostova H, Pankova J, Mandysova P, Skvrnakova J. Subjektivně pociťované potíže při polykání: výzkumné šetření pomocí nástroje EAT-10. (Subjectively perceived difficulties in swallowing: a research study using the EAT10) Profese online. 2012;5(1):31-34. (in Czech) Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.