Cent Eur J Nurs Midw 2013, 4(4):684-692
Nursing interventions - comparison use of non-intensive surgical units and intensive surgical units
- 1 Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Palacký University Olomouc
- 2 Department of Nursing, Masaryk University Faculty of Medicine
- 3 Faculty Hospital Brno
Aim: Determine the frequency use of nursing interventions to non-intensive surgical departments and surgical intensive care unit (ICU). Compare the frequency of use of interventions between these departments and compare the results with the findings of the research team NIC.
Methods: Informations obtained quantitative research method using a questionnaire. The questionnaire contained 101 names and definitions of selected nursing interventions classification (NIC). Nurses in these interventions reflect the frequency of their use in surgical clinical nursing practice. For inductive analysis was used Pearson's chi-square test at a significance level of α = 0.05.
Results: The survey was attended by 11 hospitalis and were evaluated used 255 questionnaires completed by general nurses who worked at non-intensive surgical departments and 45 questionnaires completed general nurses who worked in intensive surgical departments. It was found 50 interventions that as often used on non-intensive department and intensive department, 49 interventions that are more ofen used in surgical intensive care and 2 interventions that are more ofen used in non-intensive surgical departments.
Conclusion: In the survey, we have found different declarations frequency use of interventions between non-intensive surgical department and intensive care units. The results show that the highest number of tested interventions were no differences in frequency of use between the intensive and non-intensive care. Compared with the results of the survey conducted research team NIC, we found that nurses often perform to non-intensive surgical department interventions that have been evaluated by the research team NIC as more used in intensive care units.
Keywords: surgical nursing, standardized nursing terminology, non-intensive care, intensive care
Published: September 30, 2013 Show citation
ACS | AIP | APA | ASA | Harvard | Chicago | Chicago Notes | IEEE | ISO690 | MLA | NLM | Turabian | Vancouver |
References
- BULECHEK, G., BUTCHER, G. et al. Nursing Interventions Classification (NIC). 6th ed. St. Louis: Mosby, Elsevier, 2012. 608 p.
- BULECHEK, G., BUTCHER, G. et al. Nursing Interventions Classification (NIC). 5th ed. St. Louis: Mosby, Elsevier, 2008. 976 p.
- DOLÁK, F., SCHOLZ, P., TÓTHOVÁ, V. Postoj sester k ošetřovatelským klasifikačním systémům. Kontakt. 2012, 14(4), 434 - 443.
Go to original source...
- HŮSKOVÁ, J., JUŘENÍKOVÁ, P. Analýza plánování péče o dýchací cesty v podmínkách intenzivního ošetřovatelství. In JUŘENÍKOVÁ, P. et al. (eds). Sborník 5. mezinárodní konference všeobecných sester a pracovníků vzdělávajících nelékařská zdravotnická povolání. Brno: NCO NZO, 2010. s. 25-31.
- KAUTZ, D., KUIPER, R., PESUT, D. et. al. Using NANDA, NIC, and NOC (NNN) language for clinical reasoning with the Outcome-Present State-Test (OPT) model. International Journal of Nursing Terminologies and Classifications. 2010, 17(3), 129-138.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- EUNJOO, L., MIKYOUNG, L. Comparison of Nursing Interventions Performed by Medici - Surgical Nurses in Korea and the United States. International Journal of Nursing Terminologies and Classifications. 2006, 17(2), 108-117.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- McCLOSKEY, J., BULECHEK, M. et al. Nursing Interventions Classification (NIC). 4nd ed. St. Louis: Mosby, Elsevier, 2004. 1062 p.
- McCLOSKEY, J., BULECHEK, M. et al. Nursing Interventions Classification (NIC). 2nd ed. St. Louis: Mosby, Elsevier, 1996. 739 p.
- MÜLLER-STAUB, M. et al. Meeting the criteria of a nursing diagnosis classification: Evalution of ICNPs, ICF, NANDA and ZEFP. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 2007, 44(5), 702-713.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- PADYŠÁKOVÁ, H., HUTTOVÁ, M. Štandardizovaná terminológia v pediatrickom ošetrovateľstve. Ošetrovateľský obzor. 2008, 5(1), 9-14.
- POKORNÁ, A., KRETHOVÁ, D. Možnosti využití NIC, NOC v hodnocení bolesti na Hematoonkologickém oddělení. In BUŽGOVÁ, R., SIKOROVÁ, L. (eds). Ošetřovatelská diagnostika založená na důkazech II. Ostrava: Repronis Ostrava, 2008. s. 43-47.
- POSPÍŠILOVÁ, A., KYASOVÁ, M. Intervence klasifikace NIC v chirurgickém ošetřovatelství. In POSPÍŠILOVÁ, A, STRAKOVÁ, J., JUŘENÍKOVÁ, P. Sborník VII. Mezinárodní konference všeobecných sester a pracovníků vzdělávajících nelékařská zdravotnická povolání. Brno: NCO NZO, 2013. s. 198-210.
- POSPÍŠILOVÁ, A., KYASOVÁ, M. et. al. Faktory ovlivňující používaní ošetřovatelských intervencí v chirurgické klinické praxi. In POSPÍŠILOVÁ, A, STRAKOVÁ, J., JUŘENÍKOVÁ, P. Sborník VII. Mezinárodní konference všeobecných sester a pracovníků vzdělávajících nelékařská zdravotnická povolání. Brno: NCO NZO, 2013. s. 211-220.
- POSPÍŠILOVÁ, A., KYASOVÁ, M., JUŘENÍKOVÁ, P. Znalost pojmů NANDA -International, NIC A NOC s ohledem na vzdělání všeobecných sester. Kontakt. 2012, 14(4), 421-433.
Go to original source...
- ÚZIS ČR. Kardexy jednotlivých krajů r. 2010. [online]. 2010. [cit. 2012-9-12]. Dostupné z: ˂http://www.uzis.cz/˃.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.