Cent Eur J Nurs Midw 2013, 4(3):609-613
Using the Braden scale for the prediction of pressure sore risk: inter-rater reliability
- 1 Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Studies, University of Pardubice
- 2 Neurology Clinic, Pardubice Regional Hospital
Aim: The accuracy of the screening scales for identification of patients who are at risk of developing pressure sores has, so far, received only marginal attention in the Czech Republic. The aim was to extend a pilot study that focused on inter-rater reliability of the Braden Scale and to determine inter-rater reliability for a larger patient sample.
Methods: Two raters performed independent assessments of 60 patients hospitalized with a neurological disease, using the Braden Scale. Total scores (max. 23 points) were dichotomized (at risk versus not at risk) using the recommended cut-off score (18 points). Using the kappa (κ) coefficient, inter-rater reliability was expressed for the dichotomized total scores as well as for scores obtained for each category of the scale.
Results: For the dichotomized total results, the κ coefficient was 0.564 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.182; 0.946). For the individual categories, the κ coefficient was as follows: "sensory perception" 0.557 (95% CI = 0.306; 0.808); "moisture" 0.454 (95% CI = 0.142; 0.766); "activity" 0.613 (95% CI = 0.425; 0.801); "mobility" 0.091 (95% CI = - 0.127; 0.309); "nutrition" 0.283 (95% CI = 0.095; 0.471); and "friction and shear" 0.554 (95% CI = 0.240; 0.868).
Conclusion: For the dichotomized total scores, moderate inter-rater reliability (κ = 0.564) was obtained. For the category "activity", the inter-rater reliability was quite good (κ = 0.613); for other categories, it was lower. Factors that may have affected the results are discussed.
Keywords: cut-off score, pressure sore, inter-rater reliability, screening, Braden Scale
Published: September 30, 2013 Show citation
References
- AYELLO, E. A. Predicting pressure ulcer risk. Try This: Best Practices in Nursing Care to Older Adults [online]. 2012. [cit. 2012-07-05]. Dostupné z: <http://consultgerirn.org/uploads/File/trythis/try_this_5.pdf>.
- CREWSON, P. E. Reader agreement studies. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2005, 184(5), 1391-1397.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- DUŠEK, L., PAVLÍK, T., KOPTÍKOVÁ, J. Analýza dat v neurologii: VI. Přesnost, spolehlivost a reprodukovatelnost měření u diskrétních dat. Česká a slovenská neurologie a neurochirurgie. 2007, 70/103(6), 719-721.
- ENDACOTT, R., BENBENISHTY, J., SEHA, M. Preparing research instruments for use with different cultures. Intensive and Critical Care Nursing. 2010, 26, 64-68.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- KOPEČEK, M., ŠTĚPÁNKOVÁ, H. Test-retest minutové slovní produkce v kategorii zvířata a kratších variant u seniorů. Psychiatrie. 2009, 13(2-3), 61-65.
- KOTTNER, J., DASSEN, T. An interrater reliability study of the Braden scale in two nursing homes. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 2008, 45, 1501-1511.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- MANDYSOVÁ, P., EHLER, E., TREJABLOVÁ, L. Česká verze Škály Bradenové: metodika překladu a shoda mezi posuzovateli. Ošetrovateľstvo. [online]. 2012, 2(4), 137-142. [cit. 2013-01-01]. Dostupné z: <http://www.osetrovatelstvo.eu/_files/2012/04/137-ceskaverze-skaly-bradenove-metodika-prekladu-a-shoda-meziposuzovateli.pdf >.
- SIM, J., WRIGHT, C. C. The kappa statistic in reliability studies: Use, interpretation, and sample size requirements. Physical Therapy. 2005, 85(3), 257-268.
Go to original source...
- VIERA, A. J., GARRETT, J. M. Understanding interobserver agreement: The kappa statistic. Family Medicine. [online]. 2005, 37(5), 360-363. [cit. 2012-07-05]. Dostupné z: <http://www1.cs.columbia.edu/~julia/courses/CS6998/Interrater_agreement.Kappa_statistic.pdf>.
Go to PubMed...
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.