Cent Eur J Nurs Midw 2012, 3(4):475-483

The content validation of nursing diagnosis Deficient fluid volume

Renáta Zeleníková1,*, Katarína Žiaková2
1 Department of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine, Unviersity of Ostrava, Ostrava
2 Department of Nursing, Jessenius Medical Faculty in Martin, Comenius University in Bratislava, Slovakia

Aim: The aim of this study is to validate the defining characteristics of a nursing diagnosis of Deficient Fluid Volume by considering a selected sample of Slovak nurse - experts. In other words, to ascertain which defining characteristics are rated by these nurses as major or minor.

Methods: Fehring's Diagnostic Content Validation model (DCV model) was used for validation of this nursing diagnosis. Slovak nurses who met the modified criteria (4 points) recommended by Fehring comprised the sample of experts - a total of 116 Slovak nurses - experts. Defining characteristics were rated by the nurses using Likert's 5-point scale (1 - not at all characteristic, 2 - very little characteristic, 3 - somewhat characteristic, 4 - considerably characteristic, 5 - very characteristic). Data collection occurred between May and October 2010.

Results: Out of 17 defining characteristics of a nursing diagnosis of Deficient Fluid Volume, the Slovak nurses' sample classified six cues a s major: decreased skin turgor, decreased urine output, dry mucous membranes, decreased tongue turgor, decreased venous filling, and decreased blood pressure. The following cues were classified as minor defining characteristics: increased urine concentration, dry skin, elevated hematocrit, weakness, thirst, decreased pulse volume and pressure, increased pulse rate, changes in mental status, increased body temperature. The weighted score of the defining characteristic "sudden weight loss (except in the third space) was less than 0.5.

Conclusion: The Slovak nurses' sample studied considered six characteristics as important in justifying the nursing diagnosis Deficient Fluid Volume.

Keywords: nursing diagnosis, validation, Fehring's Diagnostic Content Validation model, Deficient Fluid Volume

Published: September 30, 2012  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Zeleníková R, Žiaková K. The content validation of nursing diagnosis Deficient fluid volume. Ošetřovatelství a porodní asistence. 2012;3(4):475-483.
Download citation

References

  1. ARMSTRONG, L. E. Assessing Hydration Status: the elusive gold standard. Journal of American college of nutrition. 2007, 26(5), 575-584. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Classification of Nursing Diagnoses: Proceedings of the Sixth Conference North American Nursing Diagnosis Association. HURLEY, M. E. (eds.). St. Louis: Mosby, 1986. 594 p.
  3. COLLETI, J. E., BROWN, M., SHARIEFF, G. Q., BARAT, I. A., ISHIMINE, P. The management of children with gastroenteritis and dehydration in the emergency department. The Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2010, 38(5), 686-698. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. ELGART, H. N. Assessment of fluids and electrolytes. AAACN Clinical Issues. 2004, 15(4), 607-621. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. FEHRING, R. J. Validation diagnostic labels: standardized methodology. In Classification of nursing diagnoses: Proceedings of the Sixth conference. St. Louis: Mosby, 1986. p. 183-190.
  6. FEHRING, R. J. Methods to validate nursing diagnoses. Heart and Lung: the journal of critical care. 1987, 16(6), 625-629.
  7. FERRY, M. Strategies for Ensuring Good Hydration in the Elderly. Nutrition Reviews. 2005, 63(6), 22-29. Go to original source...
  8. GERSHAN, J. A., ROSS, J. A., SMEJKAL, C., SCHNEIDER, K., JOHNSON, D. Fluid volume deficit: Validating the indicators. Heart & Lung. 1990, 19(2), 152156.
  9. GROSS, C. R., LINDQUIST, R. D., WOOLLEY, A. C., GRANIERI, R., ALLARD, K., WEBSTER, B. Clinical indicators of dehydration severity in elderly patients. Journal of Emergency Medicine. 1992, 10(3), 267-274. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. HOFF, R. G., DIJK, G. W., ALGRA, A., KALKMAN, C. J., RINKEL, G. J. E. Fluid balance and blood volume measurement after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurocrit Care. 2008a, 8(3), 391-397. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. HOFF, R. G., RINKEL, G. J. E., VERWEIJ, B. H., ALGRA, A., KALKMAN, C. J. Nurses´ prediction of volume status after aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage: a prospective cohort study. Critical Care. 2008b, 12(6), 1-5. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. KIM, M. J. Historical Development of Diagnostic Nomenclature. In Classification of Nursing Diagnoses: Proceedings of the Third and Fourth National Conferences. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1982. p. 386-393.
  13. KOZIEROVÁ, B., ERBOVÁ, G., OLIVIEROVÁ, R. Ošetrovateľstvo 1, 2. 1. slovenské vyd. Martin: Osveta, 1995. 1474 s. MYTHEN, M., VERCUEIL, A. Fluid balance. Vox sanguinis. 2004, 87(suppl. 1), 77-81. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. NANDA International. Nursing Diagnoses: Definitions & Classification 2009 - 2011. HERDMAN, T. H. (ed). 1th ed. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009. 435 p.
  15. NANDA International. Ošetřovatelské diagnózy. Definice a klasifikace 2009 - 2011. HERDMAN, T. H. (ed). 1. české vyd. Praha: Grada, 2010. 480 s.
  16. PLACE, B., FIELD, D. The management of fluid balance. Nursing Times. 1997, 93(44), 46-48.
  17. RIMARČÍK, M. Štatistika pre prax. 1. vyd. Marián Rimarčík, 2007. 200 s.
  18. ROSSI, L. A., DALRI, M. C., FERRAZ, A. E., CARVALHO, E. C., HAYASHIDA, M. Fluid volume deficit: profile of defining characteristics in patients with burns. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 1998, 6(3), 85-94. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. SCHÜCK, O. Nejčastější poruchy vnitřního prostředí. Doporučené postupy pro praktické lékaře. ČLS JEP [online]. 2002. [cit. 2011-04-04]. Dostupné z: < http://www.cls.cz/seznam-doporucenych-postupu>.
  20. SOŠKA, V., ŠEVČÍK, P. Metabolizmus a výživa kriticky nemocných. In ŠEVČÍK, P., ČERNÝ, V., VÍTOVEC, J. et al. Intenzívna medicína. 1. vyd. Praha: Galén, Karolinum, 2000. s. 311-337.
  21. TOTO, K. H. Fluid Balance Assessment. Critical care nursing clinics of North America. 1999, 10(4), 383-400. Go to original source...
  22. VIVANTI, A., HARVEY, K., ASH, S., BATTUSTUTTA, D. Clinical assessment of dehydration in older people admitted to hospital: What are the strongest indicators? Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics. 2008, 47(3), 340-355. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. VIVANTI, A., HARVEY, K., ASH, S. Developing a quick and practical screen to improve the identification of poor hydration in geriatric and rehabilitative care. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics. 2010, 50(2), 156-164. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  24. ZADÁK, Z. Poruchy vodního a elektrolytového hospodářství. In KLENER, P. et al. Vnitřní lékařství. 1. vyd. Praha: Galén, Karolinum, 1999. s. 651-663.
  25. ZELENÍKOVÁ, R., ŽIAKOVÁ, K., ČÁP, J., JAROŠOVÁ, D., VRUBLOVÁ Y. Návrh kritérií výberu expertov pre validizáciu ošetrovateľských diagnóz v ČR a SR. Kontakt. 2010, 12(4), 407-413. Go to original source...
  26. ZELENÍKOVÁ, R., ŽIAKOVÁ, K., SIKOROVÁ, L. Deficit objemu telových tekutín hodnotený sestrami podľa diagnostických znakov ošetrovateľskej diagnózy. Praktický Lékař. 2011, 91(12), 731-734.
  27. ŽIAKOVÁ, K. et al. Ošetrovateľský slovník. 1. vyd. Martin: Osveta, 2009. 218 s.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.