Cent Eur J Nurs Midw 2011, 2(2):185-189
Validation of nursing diagnosis the Chronic confusion in the conditions of Slovak clinical practice
- Department of Nursing, Jessenius Medical Faculty in Martin, Comenius University in Bratislava
Aim: The aim of this study was the content validation of nursing diagnosis Chronic confusion and the identification of the defining characteristics in the conditions of Slovak clinical practice.
Methodology: For the validation we used Diagnostic Content Validity Model (model DCV) as per Fehring. We consider the experts were nurses, who achieved minimum of 4 points according to the modified Fehring's criteria. Experts assessed the importance of defining characteristics of nursing diagnosis using prepared validation worksheet. Validation worksheet contained 9 defining characteristics of nursing diagnosis, 1 neutral characteristic and two items from the tool MMSE (Folstein test, Mini-Mental State Examination). The group of experts consisted of 144 Slovak nurses.
Results: Experts consider as the most important defining characteristic (score more than 0,75) the changes in time-spatial orientation (score 0,87), clinical evidence of organic brain impairment (score 0,78), long-standing cognitive impairment (score 0,78), altered interpretations to stimuli and altered response to stimuli (score 0.76), and progressive cognitive impairment (0,76), which are same with the characteristics of the syndrome of dementia.
Conclusion: Experts did not consider all the defining characteristics of nursing diagnosis Chronic confusion as equally important. Certain proportion is the actual composition set of experts, who filled the first minimum threshold criteria for expert, an incompatibility NANDA International Taxonomy II with the list of nursing diagnoses.
Keywords: validation, nursing diagnosis, Chronic confusion, defining characteristics, dementia
Published: September 30, 2011 Show citation
References
- FEHRING, R.J. 1986. Validating diagnostic labels: Standardized methodology. In HURLEY, M.E. Classification of nursing diagnoses: Proceedings of the sixth conference. St. Louis : Mosby, 1986. p. 183-190.
- FEHRING, R.J. 1987. Methods to validate nursing diagnoses. In Heart and Lung: the journal of critical care. 1987, vol. 16, no. 6, p. 625-629.
- FICK, D.M. et al. 2007. Recognizing Delirium Superimposed on Dementia. Assessing Nurses´ Knowledge Using Case Vignettes. In Journal of Gerontological Nursing. 2007, vol. 33, no. 2, p. 40-47.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- FOLSTEIN, M.F., FOLSTEIN, S.E., McHUGH, P.R. 1975. Mini-Mental State a Practical Method for Grading the Cognitive State of Patients for the Clinician. In Journal of Psychiatric Research. 1975, vol. 12, no. 3, p. 189-198.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- GURKOVÁ, E., ČÁP, J., ŽIAKOVÁ, K. 2010. Obsahová validizácia beznádeje a jej význam pri konštrukcii nástrojov jej merania. In Ošetřovatelství a porodní asistence. 2010, roč. 1, č. 3, s. 74-82.
- HOLMANOVÁ, E., ŽIAKOVÁ, K., ČÁP. J. 2006. Metodologické poznámky k problematike validizácie ošetrovateľských diagnóz. In Kontakt. 2006, roč. VIII, č. 1, s. 25 - 29.
Go to original source...
- HŐSCHL, C. et al. 2002. Psychiatrie. 1. vyd. Praha: Tigris, 2002. 895 s.
- HUDSON, S., RATCHFORD, J. 2011. Confused about Confusion? National Center of Continuing Education [online]. 2011. [cit. 2011-04-29]. Dostupný z WWW: <http://www.nursece.com/online_course.php?id=9178>.
- KOLIBÁŠ, E. 2010. Príručka klinickej psychiatrie. 2. doplnené vyd. Nové Zámky: Psychoprof, 2010. 304 s.
- LEVIN, R. 2001. Who Are the Experts? A Commentary on Nursing Diagnosis Validation Studies. In Nursing Diagnosis. 2001, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 29-32.
Go to original source...
- MEDZINÁRODNÁ KLASIFIKÁCIA CHORÔB MKCH-10. 2006. Národné centrum zdravotníckych informácií [online]. 2006. [cit. 2011-03-11]. Dostupný z WWW: <http://data.nczisk.sk/old/infozz/mkch/mkch10/cast0500.pdf>.
- NANDA International. 2009. Nursing Diagnoses: Definitions & Classification 2009-2011. Ed. T.H. Herdman. 1th ed. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009. 435 p.
- NINR. 2006. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NURSING RESEARCH. Confusion [online]. 2006, p. 1-15 [cit. 2011-0311]. Dostupný z WWW: <http://www.ninr.nih.gov/NR/rdonlyres/87C83B44-6FC64183-96FE-67E00623ACE0/4766/Chap2.pdf>.
- RIED, S., DASSEN, T. 2000. Chronic confusion, Dementia, and Impairedd Environmental Interpretation Syndrome: A concept Comparison. In Nursing Diagnosis. 2000, vol. 11, no. 2, p. 51-59.
Go to original source...
- RIED, S., GUTZMANN, H. 2003. The nursing phenomenon "chronic confusion" in relation to the diagnosis "dementia". In Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics. 2003, vol. 36, no. 4, p. 297-302.
Go to original source...
- Vyhláška MZ SR č. 306/2005 Z.z., ktorou sa ustanovuje zoznam sesterských diagnóz.
- WINNIFRED, C.M. 1991. Nursing Diagnosis: The importance of a definition. In International Journal of Nursing terminologies and classifications. 1991, vol. 2, no. 1, p. 3-8.
Go to original source...
- ZELENÍKOVÁ, R. et al. 2010. Návrh kritérií výberu expertov pre validizáciu ošetrovateľských diagnóz v ČR a SR. In Kontakt. 2010, roč. 12, č. 4, s. 407-413.
Go to original source...
- ZELENÍKOVÁ, R., ŽIAKOVÁ, K. 2010. Validizačné štúdie ošetrovateľských diagnóz. In Ošetřovatelství a porodní asistence. 2010, roč. 1, č. 1, s. 1-9.
- ŽIAKOVÁ, K., ČÁP, J., GURKOVÁ, E. 2008. Content Validation of Hopelessness in Slovakia. In Acta Medica Martiniana. 2008, vol. 8, no. 2, p. 31-36.
- ŽIAKOVÁ, K. et al. 2009. Ošetrovateľský slovník. 1. vyd. Martin: Vydavateľstvo Osveta, 2009. 218 s.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.